I agree that this site is using cookies. You can find further informations
here
.
X
Login
Merkliste (
0
)
Home
About us
Home About us
Our history
Profile
Press & public relations
Friends
The library in figures
Exhibitions
Projects
Training, internships, careers
Films
Services & Information
Home Services & Information
Lending and interlibrary loans
Returns and renewals
Training and library tours
My Account
Library cards
New to the library?
Download Information
Opening hours
Learning spaces
PC, WLAN, copy, scan and print
Catalogs and collections
Home Catalogs and Collections
Rare books and manuscripts
Digital collections
Subject Areas
Our sites
Home Our sites
Central Library
Law Library (Juridicum)
BB Business and Economics (BB11)
BB Physics and Electrical Engineering
TB Engineering and Social Sciences
TB Economics and Nautical Sciences
TB Music
TB Art & Design
TB Bremerhaven
Contact the library
Home Contact the library
Staff Directory
Open access & publishing
Home Open access & publishing
Reference management: Citavi & RefWorks
Publishing documents
Open Access in Bremen
zur Desktop-Version
Toggle navigation
Merkliste
1 Ergebnisse
1
Reliability of non-pretested versus pretested questions in ..:
Carol Blow
;
Hilton Dixon
;
Paul Milne
.
10779/lincoln.24338836.v1. , 2014
Link:
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Rel..
RT Journal T1
Reliability of non-pretested versus pretested questions in the applied knowledge test (AKT) of the MRCGP: evidence of quality assurance
UL https://suche.suub.uni-bremen.de/peid=base-ftunivoxfordfig:oai:figshare.com:article_24338836&Exemplar=1&LAN=DE A1 Carol Blow A1 Hilton Dixon A1 Paul Milne A1 Niro Siriwardena YR 2014 K1 A300 - Clinical medicine K1 assessment K1 examination K1 general practice K1 knowledge K1 medical licensing K1 NotOAChecked K1 primary care JF 10779/lincoln.24338836.v1 LK http://dx.doi.org/https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Reliability_of_non-pretested_versus_pretested_questions_in_the_applied_knowledge_test_AKT_of_the_MRCGP_evidence_of_quality_assurance/24338836 DO https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Reliability_of_non-pretested_versus_pretested_questions_in_the_applied_knowledge_test_AKT_of_the_MRCGP_evidence_of_quality_assurance/24338836 SF ELIB - SuUB Bremen
Export
RefWorks (nur Desktop-Version!)
Flow
(Zuerst in
Flow
einloggen, dann importieren)